One of the more controversial predictions I made for 2010 was that 3D in the home just won’t make it this year.  It’s been entertaining to sit back and watch the industry try to push it on us, while consumers sit back with blank expressions going “Why?”.  In this article in the Sydney Morning Herald, a reporter visits a few electronics stores to get the skinny on 3D TV and is met with comical ignorance.

In one store a salesman cranked up a 3D soccer game for me on a 140-centimetre Samsung, explained the technology and handed me the glasses. I told him the image was crap. He tried the glasses himself, consulted with a colleague and discovered they had to be turned on.

(…)

There was a Sony display alongside, half the screen showing soccer in 2D, the other half in 3D. I asked if I could have a look but, no, the glasses had a flat battery, which was kind of surprising in a shop that sells batteries.

In another store a single Samsung was running an animation. I received a perfunctory explanation of the technology and had to ask for the glasses. After searching out the back, the salesman told me they’d run out of charge but the guy from Samsung would be in tomorrow if I wanted to come back. Maybe the salesman didn’t know how to recharge them.

If the vendors can’t even make a compelling pitch or maintain the equipment, what hope to regular people have for a) Seeing how good/bad it is, and b) maintaining it themselves?

via 3DTV, sony, LG, samsung.